Leading, Slipping, Gaining, Lagging Analysis:
Assessing Local Government Employment Growth
Across Texas Counties
Local Government
Employment Growth
County vs Statewide Average: 2010-2022 and 2022
Local Government
Employment Growth
Texas:
2010-2022 = 0.62%
2022 = 1.96%
Borrowing from an approach that sometimes appears in the finance sections of the popular press, LSGL analysis is a handy and versatile way to compare, portray and classify the patterns of local government employment growth across all of Texas' 254 counties. In finance, this technique is used for comparing and assessing the market performance of individual securities or across industry sectors. For example, the performance of the 30 stocks contained within Dow are compared with one another over the past week in contrast to their performance over the past month using the Dow's respective averages as the points of reference.
Here in this Texas Regional Economic Analysis Project report, we adopt this approach to gauge and compare the local government employment growth of Texas' 254 counties over the latest available year (2022) against the backdrop of their growth over the long term period (2010-2022). In so doing we classify their growth and performance into 4 broad categories: Leading, Slipping, Gaining and Lagging.
Local Government
Employment Growth
County vs Statewide Average: 2010-2022 and 2022
Local Government
Employment Growth
Texas:
2010-2022 = 0.62%
2022 = 1.96%
This figure displays the 254 counties of Texas as dots on a scattergram, with the vertical axis representing the average annual local government employment growth rate over the long-term period (2010-2022), and the horizontal axis representing the local government employment growth rate for the near-term (2022).
This figure sets apart those counties whose long-term local government employment growth exceeded the statewide average of 0.62%, by portraying them in the top two quadrants demarcated at 0.62% on the vertical axis. County whose long-term average annual local government employment growth rate trailed the statewide average (0.62%) are distributed in the bottom two quadrants. In all, 64 counties surpassed the statewide average over 2010-2022, while 166 counties fell below.
Similarly, the two quadrants on the right of this figure present the positions of the 132 counties whose most recent (2022) local government employment growth rate exceeded the statewide average (1.96%). The two quadrants on the left feature those 98 counties whose local government employment growth over 2022 trailed the statewide average.
Accordingly, each quadrant portrays the performance of all 254 counties corresponding with their long-term (2010-2022) and near-term (2022) performance relative to their respective statewide averages of 0.62% over 2010-2022 and 1.96% over 2022:
Leading counties () (top-right quadrant)...are counties whose average annual local government employment growth rate surpassed the statewide average both long-term (0.62%) and near-term (1.96%).
Slipping counties () (top-left quadrant)...are counties whose long-term average annual local government employment growth rate exceeded the statewide average (0.62%), but whose near-term growth has "slipped" by falling below the Texas average (1.96%).
Gaining counties () (bottom-right quadrant)...are counties whose long-term average annual local government employment growth rate fell below the statewide average (0.62%), but whose near-term growth has "gained" by registering above the average (1.96%) statewide.
Lagging counties () (bottom-left quadrant)...are counties whose average annual local government employment growth rate fell under the statewide average both long-term (0.62%) and near-term (1.96%).
   
 
Summary of Texas' 254 County Totals
 
Short Term Average
 
 
Below
(1.96%)
Above
(1.96%)
 
Long
Term
Average
Above
(0.62%)
17
47
64
Below
(0.62%)
81
85
166
 
98
132
230
 
   
Leading Counties
2022 vs. 2010-2022 Averages
Leading Counties
white dot
Texas:
2010-2022 = 0.62%
2022 = 1.96%
Turning attention to the top-right quadrant from the discussion above, this figure features the distribution of the Texas counties classified as Leading. These counties surpassed Texas' average annual local government employment growth both long-term (2010-2022 = 0.62%) as well as near-term (2022 = 1.96%). Each is identified by its corresponding ranking based on it's average annual local government employment growth rate over 2010-2022.
Of Texas' 254 counties, 47 (19%) are classified within the Leading () category. Those counties ranked by their long-term average include:
Slipping Counties
2022 vs. 2010-2022 Averages
Slipping Counties
Texas:
2010-2022 = 0.62%
2022 = 1.96%
This figure depicts the distribution of the 17 Texas counties classified as Slipping (top-left quadrant), in that their long-term average annual local government employment growth rate outpaced the average statewide (2010-2022 = 0.62%), while they trailed the statewide average near-term (2022 = 1.96%). Again, each county is identified by it's corresponding ranking based on its average annual local government employment growth rate over 2010-2022.
Only 17 (7%) of Texas' 254 counties are classified as Slipping (). Those counties ranked by their long-term average include:
Gaining Counties
2022 vs. 2010-2022 Averages
Gaining Counties
white dot
Texas:
2010-2022 = 0.62%
2022 = 1.96%
This figure shows the distribution of the 85 Texas counties classified as Gaining (bottom-right quadrant), in that their long-term average annual local government employment growth rate posted below the average statewide (2010-2022 = 0.62%), while they outpaced Texas' average near-term (2022 = 1.96%). Again, each county is identified by its corresponding ranking based on its average annual local government employment growth rate over 2010-2022.
Of Texas' 254 counties, 33% (85) are featured as Gaining (). Those counties ranked by their long-term average include:
Lagging Counties
2022 vs. 2010-2022 Averages
Lagging Counties
white dot
Texas:
2010-2022 = 0.62%
2022 = 1.96%
This figure depicts the distributions of the 81 Texas counties classified as Lagging (bottom-left quadrant). These counties trailed the statewide average annual local government employment growth both long-term (2010-2022 = 0.62%) as well as near-term (2022 = 1.96%). Again, each county is identified by its corresponding ranking based on it's average annual local government employment growth rate over 2010-2022.
32% of Texas' counties, 81 of 254, are characterized here as Lagging (). Those counties ranked by their long-term average include:
   
 
Texas
Local Government Employment Growth
County vs. Statewide Average
 
2010-2022
 
2022
 
 
Leading Counties
 
39
1.19
 
106
2.60
1,382
 
55
0.77
 
93
2.92
493
 
62
0.68
 
63
4.02
2,483
 
31
1.37
 
100
2.73
17,022
 
59
0.76
 
78
3.32
2,393
 
61
0.69
 
126
2.16
1,748
 
34
1.32
 
118
2.36
694
 
3
3.66
 
20
6.25
2,806
 
5
3.14
 
114
2.50
7,338
 
1
5.34
 
1
61.89
429
 
22
1.68
 
21
6.20
1,011
 
18
1.73
 
60
4.12
8,213
 
49
0.90
 
75
3.41
1,608
 
40
1.18
 
28
5.56
418
 
58
0.76
 
133
2.00
18,800
 
60
0.73
 
98
2.81
1,463
 
27
1.48
 
92
2.93
6,980
 
21
1.70
 
87
3.09
767
 
25
1.53
 
10
7.81
5,506
 
15
1.94
 
27
5.65
710
 
32
1.37
 
14
7.17
8,181
 
12
2.07
 
130
2.10
1,165
 
7
2.57
 
7
9.17
6,825
 
10
2.19
 
58
4.25
2,308
 
50
0.88
 
8
8.91
281
 
44
1.04
 
50
4.49
1,023
 
2
4.17
 
90
2.97
693
 
24
1.62
 
3
12.75
1,415
 
6
3.05
 
5
9.35
4,900
 
19
1.72
 
124
2.17
17,431
 
16
1.85
 
34
5.20
647
 
36
1.26
 
4
10.37
660
 
63
0.67
 
49
4.56
4,912
 
28
1.45
 
43
4.72
2,839
 
9
2.43
 
64
4.02
29,176
 
20
1.72
 
22
6.19
5,956
 
23
1.66
 
42
4.84
520
 
8
2.44
 
24
6.10
2,800
 
17
1.76
 
125
2.17
424
 
46
1.00
 
107
2.57
877
 
47
0.94
 
80
3.29
408
 
52
0.84
 
109
2.54
9,884
 
54
0.82
 
2
15.49
656
 
11
2.13
 
62
4.07
562
 
45
1.00
 
83
3.24
861
 
14
1.95
 
77
3.33
24,178
 
42
1.07
 
74
3.41
2,394
Slipping Counties
 
48
0.90
 
151
1.44
494
 
56
0.77
 
156
1.25
81
 
43
1.05
 
178
0.76
1,194
 
38
1.20
 
179
0.74
9,628
 
64
0.67
 
210
-1.11
89
 
33
1.33
 
162
1.13
3,390
 
30
1.39
 
145
1.62
27,117
 
26
1.53
 
165
1.08
38,063
 
41
1.14
 
187
0.55
6,406
 
37
1.24
 
214
-1.57
627
 
13
2.07
 
208
-0.85
465
 
35
1.31
 
142
1.70
418
 
57
0.77
 
155
1.26
12,611
 
4
3.63
 
209
-0.87
572
 
29
1.39
 
203
-0.51
4,115
 
53
0.82
 
217
-1.89
1,348
 
51
0.86
 
195
0.19
56,788
Gaining Counties
 
91
0.40
 
26
5.66
989
 
164
-0.34
 
40
4.85
108
 
227
-2.22
 
94
2.91
424
 
159
-0.27
 
129
2.12
721
 
66
0.61
 
25
5.84
4,022
 
202
-0.82
 
71
3.57
203
 
167
-0.37
 
35
5.15
1,614
 
67
0.61
 
115
2.49
18,962
 
103
0.26
 
117
2.42
5,209
 
205
-0.86
 
135
1.99
462
 
111
0.18
 
72
3.44
1,983
 
115
0.16
 
12
7.53
843
 
104
0.24
 
54
4.33
650
 
148
-0.14
 
108
2.56
22,119
 
79
0.48
 
79
3.30
1,535
 
123
0.06
 
66
3.91
531
 
134
0.00
 
6
9.30
329
 
229
-2.54
 
112
2.51
491
 
130
0.02
 
91
2.97
2,428
 
181
-0.53
 
11
7.55
228
 
203
-0.83
 
48
4.61
839
 
135
-0.01
 
69
3.61
287
 
174
-0.45
 
99
2.74
375
 
217
-1.38
 
45
4.69
803
 
125
0.04
 
123
2.27
44,922
 
161
-0.29
 
55
4.33
1,471
 
121
0.08
 
33
5.21
303
 
128
0.03
 
96
2.87
931
 
68
0.61
 
76
3.40
1,397
 
160
-0.27
 
47
4.63
407
 
100
0.31
 
39
4.88
1,118
 
199
-0.72
 
111
2.51
245
 
198
-0.71
 
65
4.00
416
 
108
0.20
 
59
4.19
3,186
 
86
0.45
 
30
5.39
46,202
 
169
-0.37
 
113
2.50
2,049
 
157
-0.24
 
101
2.71
1,781
 
65
0.62
 
36
5.09
2,169
 
179
-0.49
 
53
4.34
1,972
 
190
-0.64
 
67
3.85
945
 
150
-0.17
 
38
4.91
363
 
187
-0.61
 
81
3.27
1,929
 
230
-2.55
 
121
2.33
880
 
151
-0.18
 
9
8.07
174
 
117
0.14
 
70
3.59
2,076
 
106
0.22
 
119
2.34
306
 
213
-1.26
 
128
2.15
1,475
 
162
-0.30
 
97
2.83
762
 
133
0.00
 
120
2.33
833
 
80
0.48
 
29
5.45
271
 
132
0.00
 
15
6.78
362
 
215
-1.34
 
110
2.52
1,141
 
76
0.50
 
131
2.09
1,611
 
175
-0.46
 
51
4.41
616
 
137
-0.03
 
95
2.90
16,784
 
153
-0.20
 
73
3.43
3,918
 
126
0.04
 
127
2.15
1,712
 
109
0.20
 
121
2.33
1,232
 
201
-0.81
 
89
2.99
483
 
218
-1.43
 
103
2.70
190
 
206
-0.87
 
82
3.26
666
 
89
0.41
 
105
2.62
666
 
124
0.04
 
85
3.13
990
 
147
-0.12
 
134
2.00
919
 
114
0.17
 
41
4.84
3,982
 
149
-0.17
 
46
4.69
335
 
72
0.58
 
17
6.52
5,035
 
138
-0.06
 
19
6.34
151
 
92
0.38
 
37
4.95
233
 
93
0.38
 
16
6.65
609
 
170
-0.42
 
116
2.49
866
 
131
0.02
 
104
2.66
193
 
142
-0.10
 
52
4.39
2,806
 
84
0.47
 
88
3.02
1,810
 
71
0.60
 
61
4.08
2,426
 
112
0.17
 
32
5.21
2,686
 
97
0.33
 
57
4.29
2,356
 
96
0.35
 
84
3.14
2,199
 
118
0.12
 
68
3.84
16,645
 
186
-0.59
 
102
2.71
2,656
 
146
-0.11
 
132
2.04
6,162
 
139
-0.07
 
18
6.45
1,105
 
102
0.30
 
86
3.12
1,652
 
211
-1.03
 
13
7.51
931
 
180
-0.52
 
23
6.17
791
Lagging Counties
 
129
0.02
 
182
0.69
2,199
 
183
-0.57
 
143
1.64
4,764
 
136
-0.01
 
144
1.63
1,437
 
94
0.37
 
146
1.59
91,711
 
85
0.46
 
149
1.49
476
 
197
-0.71
 
171
0.93
1,297
 
173
-0.45
 
176
0.79
385
 
127
0.04
 
230
-4.87
606
 
107
0.21
 
164
1.10
2,199
 
178
-0.48
 
136
1.90
642
 
182
-0.56
 
197
0.00
277
 
219
-1.48
 
222
-3.00
194
 
75
0.53
 
173
0.84
958
 
224
-1.95
 
177
0.78
774
 
82
0.47
 
189
0.46
217
 
228
-2.35
 
228
-3.66
79
 
122
0.06
 
232
-6.56
342
 
220
-1.51
 
211
-1.17
338
 
223
-1.83
 
226
-3.46
363
 
110
0.19
 
190
0.45
124,729
 
185
-0.58
 
157
1.24
1,146
 
83
0.47
 
236
-11.24
1,343
 
212
-1.20
 
231
-5.80
130
 
155
-0.23
 
185
0.59
1,371
 
105
0.22
 
183
0.68
8,196
 
208
-0.91
 
161
1.14
711
 
152
-0.18
 
207
-0.79
1,387
 
210
-0.94
 
212
-1.29
459
 
194
-0.67
 
188
0.53
949
 
216
-1.37
 
229
-4.28
291
 
73
0.57
 
196
0.09
1,075
 
158
-0.26
 
137
1.86
6,805
 
207
-0.90
 
149
1.49
1,088
 
166
-0.35
 
180
0.73
1,805
 
143
-0.10
 
168
1.03
2,346
 
74
0.54
 
154
1.37
187,113
 
193
-0.66
 
160
1.17
2,929
 
113
0.17
 
227
-3.55
407
 
177
-0.48
 
169
1.02
1,981
 
171
-0.43
 
139
1.84
277
 
168
-0.37
 
224
-3.38
1,431
 
88
0.42
 
193
0.37
1,099
 
189
-0.63
 
152
1.42
1,709
 
225
-2.13
 
234
-8.91
92
 
195
-0.67
 
192
0.40
10,770
 
204
-0.84
 
194
0.36
2,493
 
163
-0.33
 
172
0.88
916
 
87
0.44
 
159
1.20
588
 
226
-2.21
 
140
1.82
783
 
188
-0.61
 
167
1.04
585
 
141
-0.09
 
221
-2.77
386
 
200
-0.77
 
206
-0.69
2,168
 
78
0.49
 
218
-2.25
8,010
 
101
0.31
 
201
-0.17
1,191
 
172
-0.43
 
184
0.62
647
 
77
0.50
 
163
1.12
90
 
221
-1.71
 
238
-16.29
2,678
 
209
-0.91
 
205
-0.65
2,895
 
191
-0.65
 
204
-0.53
565
 
144
-0.10
 
219
-2.52
1,390
 
90
0.40
 
213
-1.40
772
 
69
0.61
 
197
0.00
294
 
196
-0.70
 
220
-2.73
747
 
176
-0.47
 
174
0.84
1,203
 
192
-0.65
 
199
-0.05
1,919
 
140
-0.08
 
186
0.58
9,814
 
99
0.31
 
147
1.51
2,350
 
120
0.08
 
223
-3.16
460
 
81
0.48
 
153
1.38
221
 
119
0.12
 
181
0.71
1,273
 
214
-1.30
 
191
0.41
487
 
222
-1.76
 
225
-3.44
337
 
70
0.61
 
175
0.82
85,991
 
95
0.35
 
158
1.22
6,725
 
154
-0.22
 
166
1.08
5,161
 
98
0.32
 
148
1.50
1,153
 
145
-0.10
 
141
1.78
5,992
 
156
-0.23
 
200
-0.11
1,835
 
165
-0.34
 
237
-11.76
495
 
116
0.15
 
216
-1.82
809
 
184
-0.58
 
170
1.00
1,215
Undefined/Suppressed Counties
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
108
 
U
U
 
233
-6.93
94
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
239
-34.07
329
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
235
-9.20
316
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
121
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
138
1.85
110
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
215
-1.63
241
 
U
U
 
56
4.31
895
 
U
U
 
44
4.71
89
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
31
5.29
1,095
 
U
U
 
202
-0.50
597
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
0.62
 
1.96
1,344,878
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
-0.11
 
1.96
14,130,000
November 2023
REAP_PI_CA1500N_520320_LSGL
 
   
Analysis Options Menu
Select Year Interval
to
Select Alternative Industry
Highlight a Region (Optional)
AndersonKarnes
AndrewsKaufman
AngelinaKendall
AransasKenedy
ArcherKent
ArmstrongKerr
AtascosaKimble
AustinKing
BaileyKinney
BanderaKleberg
BastropKnox
BaylorLamar
BeeLamb
BellLampasas
BexarLa Salle
BlancoLavaca
BordenLee
BosqueLeon
BowieLiberty
BrazoriaLimestone
BrazosLipscomb
BrewsterLive Oak
BriscoeLlano
BrooksLoving
BrownLubbock
BurlesonLynn
BurnetMcCulloch
CaldwellMcLennan
CalhounMcMullen
CallahanMadison
CameronMarion
CampMartin
CarsonMason
CassMatagorda
CastroMaverick
ChambersMedina
CherokeeMenard
ChildressMidland
ClayMilam
CochranMills
CokeMitchell
ColemanMontague
CollinMontgomery
CollingsworthMoore
ColoradoMorris
ComalMotley
ComancheNacogdoches
ConchoNavarro
CookeNewton
CoryellNolan
CottleNueces
CraneOchiltree
CrockettOldham
CrosbyOrange
CulbersonPalo Pinto
DallamPanola
DallasParker
DawsonParmer
Deaf SmithPecos
DeltaPolk
DentonPotter
DeWittPresidio
DickensRains
DimmitRandall
DonleyReagan
DuvalReal
EastlandRed River
EctorReeves
EdwardsRefugio
EllisRoberts
El PasoRobertson
ErathRockwall
FallsRunnels
FanninRusk
FayetteSabine
FisherSan Augustine
FloydSan Jacinto
FoardSan Patricio
Fort BendSan Saba
FranklinSchleicher
FreestoneScurry
FrioShackelford
GainesShelby
GalvestonSherman
GarzaSmith
GillespieSomervell
GlasscockStarr
GoliadStephens
GonzalesSterling
GrayStonewall
GraysonSutton
GreggSwisher
GrimesTarrant
GuadalupeTaylor
HaleTerrell
HallTerry
HamiltonThrockmorton
HansfordTitus
HardemanTom Green
HardinTravis
HarrisTrinity
HarrisonTyler
HartleyUpshur
HaskellUpton
HaysUvalde
HemphillVal Verde
HendersonVan Zandt
HidalgoVictoria
HillWalker
HockleyWaller
HoodWard
HopkinsWashington
HoustonWebb
HowardWharton
HudspethWheeler
HuntWichita
HutchinsonWilbarger
IrionWillacy
JackWilliamson
JacksonWilson
JasperWinkler
Jeff DavisWise
JeffersonWood
Jim HoggYoakum
Jim WellsYoung
JohnsonZapata
JonesZavala
Copyright © 2023. Pacific Northwest Regional Economic Analysis Project (PNREAP). All Rights Reserved.

Please stay tuned...
while your request is processing:

Please wait while your request is being processed...
To offer the most comprehensive set of interactive options in support of your research, TX-REAP calculates and crunches most of the data and generates the narrative and graphic analysis on demand in response to your request.
Your request will soon be available.
Just a few more seconds....Your request has been generated and is now loading the results.