Leading, Slipping, Gaining, Lagging Analysis:
Assessing Real Estate and Rental and Leasing Employment Growth
Across Texas Counties
Real Estate and Rental and Leasing
Employment Growth
County vs Statewide Average: 2010-2022 and 2022
Real Estate and Rental and Leasing
Employment Growth
Texas:
2010-2022 = 4.84%
2022 = 10.72%
Borrowing from an approach that sometimes appears in the finance sections of the popular press, LSGL analysis is a handy and versatile way to compare, portray and classify the patterns of real estate and rental and leasing employment growth across all of Texas' 254 counties. In finance, this technique is used for comparing and assessing the market performance of individual securities or across industry sectors. For example, the performance of the 30 stocks contained within Dow are compared with one another over the past week in contrast to their performance over the past month using the Dow's respective averages as the points of reference.
Here in this Texas Regional Economic Analysis Project report, we adopt this approach to gauge and compare the real estate and rental and leasing employment growth of Texas' 254 counties over the latest available year (2022) against the backdrop of their growth over the long term period (2010-2022). In so doing we classify their growth and performance into 4 broad categories: Leading, Slipping, Gaining and Lagging.
Real Estate and Rental and Leasing
Employment Growth
County vs Statewide Average: 2010-2022 and 2022
Real Estate and Rental and Leasing
Employment Growth
Texas:
2010-2022 = 4.84%
2022 = 10.72%
This figure displays the 254 counties of Texas as dots on a scattergram, with the vertical axis representing the average annual real estate and rental and leasing employment growth rate over the long-term period (2010-2022), and the horizontal axis representing the real estate and rental and leasing employment growth rate for the near-term (2022).
This figure sets apart those counties whose long-term real estate and rental and leasing employment growth exceeded the statewide average of 4.84%, by portraying them in the top two quadrants demarcated at 4.84% on the vertical axis. County whose long-term average annual real estate and rental and leasing employment growth rate trailed the statewide average (4.84%) are distributed in the bottom two quadrants. In all, 77 counties surpassed the statewide average over 2010-2022, while 85 counties fell below.
Similarly, the two quadrants on the right of this figure present the positions of the 101 counties whose most recent (2022) real estate and rental and leasing employment growth rate exceeded the statewide average (10.72%). The two quadrants on the left feature those 61 counties whose real estate and rental and leasing employment growth over 2022 trailed the statewide average.
Accordingly, each quadrant portrays the performance of all 254 counties corresponding with their long-term (2010-2022) and near-term (2022) performance relative to their respective statewide averages of 4.84% over 2010-2022 and 10.72% over 2022:
Leading counties () (top-right quadrant)...are counties whose average annual real estate and rental and leasing employment growth rate surpassed the statewide average both long-term (4.84%) and near-term (10.72%).
Slipping counties () (top-left quadrant)...are counties whose long-term average annual real estate and rental and leasing employment growth rate exceeded the statewide average (4.84%), but whose near-term growth has "slipped" by falling below the Texas average (10.72%).
Gaining counties () (bottom-right quadrant)...are counties whose long-term average annual real estate and rental and leasing employment growth rate fell below the statewide average (4.84%), but whose near-term growth has "gained" by registering above the average (10.72%) statewide.
Lagging counties () (bottom-left quadrant)...are counties whose average annual real estate and rental and leasing employment growth rate fell under the statewide average both long-term (4.84%) and near-term (10.72%).
   
 
Summary of Texas' 254 County Totals
 
Short Term Average
 
 
Below
(10.72%)
Above
(10.72%)
 
Long
Term
Average
Above
(4.84%)
26
51
77
Below
(4.84%)
35
50
85
 
61
101
162
 
   
Leading Counties
2022 vs. 2010-2022 Averages
Leading Counties
white dot
Texas:
2010-2022 = 4.84%
2022 = 10.72%
Turning attention to the top-right quadrant from the discussion above, this figure features the distribution of the Texas counties classified as Leading. These counties surpassed Texas' average annual real estate and rental and leasing employment growth both long-term (2010-2022 = 4.84%) as well as near-term (2022 = 10.72%). Each is identified by its corresponding ranking based on it's average annual real estate and rental and leasing employment growth rate over 2010-2022.
Of Texas' 254 counties, 51 (20%) are classified within the Leading () category. Those counties ranked by their long-term average include:
Slipping Counties
2022 vs. 2010-2022 Averages
Slipping Counties
Texas:
2010-2022 = 4.84%
2022 = 10.72%
This figure depicts the distribution of the 26 Texas counties classified as Slipping (top-left quadrant), in that their long-term average annual real estate and rental and leasing employment growth rate outpaced the average statewide (2010-2022 = 4.84%), while they trailed the statewide average near-term (2022 = 10.72%). Again, each county is identified by it's corresponding ranking based on its average annual real estate and rental and leasing employment growth rate over 2010-2022.
Only 26 (10%) of Texas' 254 counties are classified as Slipping (). Those counties ranked by their long-term average include:
Gaining Counties
2022 vs. 2010-2022 Averages
Gaining Counties
white dot
Texas:
2010-2022 = 4.84%
2022 = 10.72%
This figure shows the distribution of the 50 Texas counties classified as Gaining (bottom-right quadrant), in that their long-term average annual real estate and rental and leasing employment growth rate posted below the average statewide (2010-2022 = 4.84%), while they outpaced Texas' average near-term (2022 = 10.72%). Again, each county is identified by its corresponding ranking based on its average annual real estate and rental and leasing employment growth rate over 2010-2022.
Of Texas' 254 counties, 20% (50) are featured as Gaining (). Those counties ranked by their long-term average include:
Lagging Counties
2022 vs. 2010-2022 Averages
Lagging Counties
white dot
Texas:
2010-2022 = 4.84%
2022 = 10.72%
This figure depicts the distributions of the 35 Texas counties classified as Lagging (bottom-left quadrant). These counties trailed the statewide average annual real estate and rental and leasing employment growth both long-term (2010-2022 = 4.84%) as well as near-term (2022 = 10.72%). Again, each county is identified by its corresponding ranking based on it's average annual real estate and rental and leasing employment growth rate over 2010-2022.
14% of Texas' counties, 35 of 254, are characterized here as Lagging (). Those counties ranked by their long-term average include:
   
 
Texas
Real Estate and Rental and Leasing Employment Growth
County vs. Statewide Average
 
2010-2022
 
2022
 
 
Leading Counties
 
34
6.63
 
9
18.57
415
 
14
8.02
 
40
13.21
960
 
53
5.79
 
78
11.68
1,109
 
52
5.83
 
111
10.96
891
 
61
5.44
 
58
12.11
1,685
 
77
4.89
 
99
11.16
9,057
 
15
7.97
 
41
13.14
680
 
70
5.08
 
100
11.15
9,649
 
11
9.00
 
53
12.24
495
 
67
5.27
 
114
10.95
3,030
 
32
6.68
 
25
14.54
260
 
27
6.86
 
75
11.72
53,600
 
58
5.54
 
52
12.32
1,368
 
4
11.34
 
103
11.11
100
 
37
6.61
 
84
11.59
35,437
 
10
9.28
 
1
25.46
813
 
28
6.82
 
69
11.81
5,444
 
50
5.92
 
49
12.48
703
 
12
8.63
 
88
11.47
34,402
 
41
6.37
 
42
13.11
1,907
 
31
6.70
 
60
12.09
482
 
23
7.47
 
82
11.62
4,699
 
48
5.97
 
36
13.31
1,354
 
17
7.76
 
76
11.72
9,190
 
49
5.94
 
50
12.48
1,866
 
30
6.78
 
89
11.46
2,927
 
43
6.31
 
92
11.42
3,416
 
72
5.05
 
45
12.84
167
 
20
7.66
 
83
11.60
510
 
3
11.96
 
24
14.59
377
 
25
7.01
 
115
10.91
1,078
 
68
5.24
 
27
14.36
231
 
36
6.62
 
101
11.14
1,247
 
26
6.96
 
102
11.12
8,202
 
60
5.45
 
81
11.62
490
 
39
6.54
 
68
11.83
23,257
 
47
5.98
 
6
20.87
278
 
64
5.42
 
15
15.79
22
 
19
7.66
 
43
12.97
5,930
 
1
16.72
 
8
18.88
340
 
8
9.30
 
2
24.40
209
 
22
7.51
 
119
10.86
4,980
 
38
6.58
 
117
10.88
377
 
55
5.64
 
56
12.18
82,485
 
40
6.41
 
87
11.50
1,445
 
5
10.82
 
10
18.15
358
 
16
7.84
 
98
11.16
23,922
 
13
8.32
 
31
13.91
1,097
 
2
12.32
 
66
11.90
141
 
35
6.62
 
28
14.22
1,968
 
7
10.08
 
15
15.79
154
Slipping Counties
 
57
5.58
 
158
9.68
748
 
73
4.97
 
148
9.95
221
 
29
6.80
 
134
10.48
9,300
 
9
9.30
 
190
2.82
182
 
33
6.65
 
143
10.21
1,425
 
66
5.34
 
177
8.20
1,069
 
51
5.85
 
182
6.63
209
 
18
7.72
 
161
9.41
279
 
71
5.07
 
172
8.74
3,732
 
44
6.20
 
138
10.40
138
 
65
5.36
 
181
7.12
406
 
63
5.42
 
184
6.61
274
 
62
5.43
 
132
10.55
4,536
 
6
10.24
 
192
1.15
439
 
69
5.11
 
169
8.89
404
 
56
5.60
 
142
10.26
333
 
54
5.67
 
145
10.09
12,486
 
75
4.96
 
149
9.87
8,082
 
74
4.96
 
188
3.30
783
 
45
6.07
 
137
10.42
392
 
59
5.50
 
185
6.61
258
 
21
7.57
 
139
10.32
1,667
 
46
6.01
 
191
1.45
140
 
42
6.34
 
160
9.46
382
 
24
7.16
 
131
10.57
680
 
76
4.94
 
179
7.60
1,288
Gaining Counties
 
118
3.56
 
77
11.70
869
 
109
3.80
 
37
13.30
2,130
 
96
4.29
 
94
11.41
65,650
 
102
4.05
 
95
11.41
420
 
145
2.47
 
59
12.10
315
 
136
3.09
 
70
11.77
750
 
139
3.01
 
65
11.97
421
 
85
4.58
 
32
13.66
649
 
142
2.81
 
3
23.31
164
 
154
1.55
 
103
11.11
210
 
115
3.62
 
34
13.53
151
 
160
-0.53
 
91
11.43
234
 
87
4.51
 
12
16.33
4,310
 
80
4.79
 
71
11.76
19
 
119
3.53
 
97
11.20
278
 
132
3.23
 
54
12.21
4,953
 
93
4.43
 
112
10.95
689
 
86
4.53
 
124
10.79
14,685
 
135
3.14
 
35
13.32
587
 
84
4.59
 
80
11.66
2,471
 
121
3.49
 
4
22.41
639
 
107
3.87
 
7
20.23
315
 
110
3.78
 
74
11.73
419
 
130
3.25
 
90
11.44
6,478
 
158
0.43
 
11
16.49
763
 
131
3.24
 
5
22.16
204
 
157
0.48
 
14
16.02
391
 
111
3.77
 
47
12.59
957
 
90
4.46
 
116
10.89
601
 
156
1.08
 
13
16.18
402
 
152
2.13
 
63
12.01
718
 
81
4.75
 
38
13.29
733
 
116
3.61
 
64
11.99
439
 
138
3.07
 
96
11.24
1,287
 
128
3.28
 
85
11.57
955
 
126
3.37
 
57
12.16
1,079
 
112
3.71
 
62
12.06
762
 
124
3.44
 
21
15.49
1,223
 
155
1.47
 
22
15.04
283
 
78
4.83
 
55
12.19
7,802
 
127
3.35
 
93
11.41
166
 
79
4.80
 
110
10.98
70,396
 
103
4.05
 
29
14.02
553
 
108
3.84
 
122
10.85
3,382
 
88
4.50
 
120
10.86
1,164
 
94
4.39
 
51
12.39
7,037
 
161
-1.09
 
113
10.95
152
 
151
2.16
 
44
12.88
149
 
106
3.91
 
33
13.56
854
 
134
3.19
 
46
12.79
485
Lagging Counties
 
114
3.65
 
153
9.77
1,045
 
92
4.43
 
133
10.55
440
 
101
4.08
 
157
9.68
2,447
 
99
4.19
 
136
10.43
8,054
 
141
2.97
 
171
8.78
384
 
147
2.46
 
130
10.59
7,227
 
113
3.66
 
175
8.42
1,082
 
120
3.50
 
196
-1.89
104
 
129
3.27
 
140
10.29
600
 
82
4.73
 
156
9.70
260
 
133
3.19
 
197
-4.03
928
 
105
4.01
 
163
9.32
148,656
 
125
3.40
 
170
8.89
20,279
 
83
4.60
 
154
9.76
10,531
 
159
0.15
 
162
9.39
303
 
162
-1.36
 
173
8.74
448
 
104
4.02
 
155
9.74
185,202
 
122
3.46
 
151
9.82
1,744
 
143
2.69
 
166
9.05
506
 
123
3.46
 
174
8.61
2,649
 
144
2.60
 
147
9.98
1,113
 
146
2.46
 
128
10.65
187
 
100
4.11
 
189
3.28
252
 
117
3.60
 
146
10.00
253
 
140
3.00
 
144
10.14
10,592
 
148
2.27
 
186
6.27
3,594
 
91
4.44
 
135
10.47
4,125
 
95
4.38
 
150
9.86
323
 
97
4.28
 
129
10.59
4,103
 
98
4.27
 
168
8.96
876
 
149
2.27
 
167
9.04
712
 
89
4.47
 
126
10.67
1,058
 
150
2.23
 
159
9.62
2,302
 
137
3.07
 
127
10.65
831
 
153
1.83
 
152
9.79
2,614
Undefined/Suppressed Counties
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
176
8.33
13
 
U
U
 
15
15.79
22
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
118
10.87
102
 
U
U
 
S
S
99
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
71
11.76
19
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
103
11.11
30
 
U
U
 
S
S
28
 
U
U
 
198
-13.39
97
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
24
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
15
15.79
22
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
79
11.67
67
 
U
U
 
183
6.62
322
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
73
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
121
10.85
143
 
U
U
 
48
12.50
27
 
U
U
 
S
S
201
 
U
U
 
86
11.54
58
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
141
10.27
1,063
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
54
 
U
U
 
103
11.11
30
 
U
U
 
67
11.87
245
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
193
0.00
5
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
193
0.00
5
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
61
12.09
102
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
193
0.00
5
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
187
6.12
104
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
23
14.93
77
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
71
11.76
19
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
103
11.11
180
 
U
U
 
164
9.23
71
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
123
10.80
195
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
15
15.79
22
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
30
13.95
147
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
180
7.59
170
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
109
11.08
361
 
U
U
 
S
S
400
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
15
15.79
22
 
U
U
 
103
11.11
130
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
26
14.40
143
 
U
U
 
165
9.09
24
 
U
U
 
39
13.29
162
 
U
U
 
178
7.94
204
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
125
10.78
113
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4.84
 
10.72
1,041,348
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3.63
 
10.26
11,832,200
November 2023
REAP_PI_CA1500N_511100_LSGL
 
   
Analysis Options Menu
Select Year Interval
to
Select Alternative Industry
Highlight a Region (Optional)
AndersonKarnes
AndrewsKaufman
AngelinaKendall
AransasKenedy
ArcherKent
ArmstrongKerr
AtascosaKimble
AustinKing
BaileyKinney
BanderaKleberg
BastropKnox
BaylorLamar
BeeLamb
BellLampasas
BexarLa Salle
BlancoLavaca
BordenLee
BosqueLeon
BowieLiberty
BrazoriaLimestone
BrazosLipscomb
BrewsterLive Oak
BriscoeLlano
BrooksLoving
BrownLubbock
BurlesonLynn
BurnetMcCulloch
CaldwellMcLennan
CalhounMcMullen
CallahanMadison
CameronMarion
CampMartin
CarsonMason
CassMatagorda
CastroMaverick
ChambersMedina
CherokeeMenard
ChildressMidland
ClayMilam
CochranMills
CokeMitchell
ColemanMontague
CollinMontgomery
CollingsworthMoore
ColoradoMorris
ComalMotley
ComancheNacogdoches
ConchoNavarro
CookeNewton
CoryellNolan
CottleNueces
CraneOchiltree
CrockettOldham
CrosbyOrange
CulbersonPalo Pinto
DallamPanola
DallasParker
DawsonParmer
Deaf SmithPecos
DeltaPolk
DentonPotter
DeWittPresidio
DickensRains
DimmitRandall
DonleyReagan
DuvalReal
EastlandRed River
EctorReeves
EdwardsRefugio
EllisRoberts
El PasoRobertson
ErathRockwall
FallsRunnels
FanninRusk
FayetteSabine
FisherSan Augustine
FloydSan Jacinto
FoardSan Patricio
Fort BendSan Saba
FranklinSchleicher
FreestoneScurry
FrioShackelford
GainesShelby
GalvestonSherman
GarzaSmith
GillespieSomervell
GlasscockStarr
GoliadStephens
GonzalesSterling
GrayStonewall
GraysonSutton
GreggSwisher
GrimesTarrant
GuadalupeTaylor
HaleTerrell
HallTerry
HamiltonThrockmorton
HansfordTitus
HardemanTom Green
HardinTravis
HarrisTrinity
HarrisonTyler
HartleyUpshur
HaskellUpton
HaysUvalde
HemphillVal Verde
HendersonVan Zandt
HidalgoVictoria
HillWalker
HockleyWaller
HoodWard
HopkinsWashington
HoustonWebb
HowardWharton
HudspethWheeler
HuntWichita
HutchinsonWilbarger
IrionWillacy
JackWilliamson
JacksonWilson
JasperWinkler
Jeff DavisWise
JeffersonWood
Jim HoggYoakum
Jim WellsYoung
JohnsonZapata
JonesZavala
Copyright © 2023. Pacific Northwest Regional Economic Analysis Project (PNREAP). All Rights Reserved.

Please stay tuned...
while your request is processing:

Please wait while your request is being processed...
To offer the most comprehensive set of interactive options in support of your research, TX-REAP calculates and crunches most of the data and generates the narrative and graphic analysis on demand in response to your request.
Your request will soon be available.
Just a few more seconds....Your request has been generated and is now loading the results.